I wrote this before lucas92 replied and tox_von edited his post and made another one.

That would be great tox_von, except what you offered sacrifices ease of setup and makes it impossible to use it in more than one situation without literally making another script with copy/paste. At the very least, offer the ability to set things up inside of void run() if you are going to suggest it for people to use. Hell, you didn't even note half of the things you have to edit in that script to make it work (and it's not limited to
int message at the top or that combo number you noted).
I'm not saying that what I made is perfect. It may not even be what Cukeman wanted. But
you have to remember the people that are using the script when you suggest "simpler" versions. This is especially important in the request forum. Yeah, your version uses less lines of code and doesn't have comments sprinkled all over it (I religiously comment almost everything I code/script/whatever, even if the comments are useless to most people). I'll give you that. I'd even welcome optimizations to what I made... so long as ease of use is not sacrificed as you did.
Sorry for that little mini-rant, but simplicity is not always the best option when it sacrifices usability.
Edit: Actually, I was wrong about the int message. That isn't supposed to be edited at all. Which makes that whole script even more confusing. Use some Dx values.