2 replies to this topic

[Lemon]

Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq

Correct me if I'm wrong (please) but I can't seem to get anything out of this other than "If we think you are doing anything against the War, than we can take property. Something about that seems logically if not morally wrong, so I'm seeking a different interpretation that isn't something completely off the deep end. I'll elabrate more on what I'm pretty sure I've just read, but now I've got to go watch All that Jazz.

Edited by EatinCake, 21 July 2007 - 09:57 PM.

[Fuzzy]

Hmmmm..... It looks even worse to me. I think it's saying "If we think that there is any risk at all of you being a terrorist, we will take stuff from you." Vote Hillary!

Also, my complete view:

We wouldn't have to have our president writing up crap like this if we weren't in Iraq. All that we should have done is said "Okay, we kicked out Osama, now let's go home." Also, we wouldn't have Americans dying if we left (no pun intended). What was the last time we were sucessfully attacked on our soil? Let's see... ALMOST SIX YEARS AGO! Sure, England has gotten bombed since then, but they're a grown-up country just like us, and it shouldn't be our problem. Lastly, What the heck are good-willed Iraqis doing!? they're sitting on their cushions watching us attempt to alleviate all of their problems. They need to step up to the plate and do their share of work.

Thanks for your time.

Edited by fuzzyman, 21 July 2007 - 10:36 PM.

[jimbob]

Welcome to "Don't diagree with us" land.

Mind you, in regard to the last comment, the good-willed Iraqis are trying to stay on their cushions and not get blown up by the bad-willed ones. Things aren't as black and white as that though.