Windows 8: Metro UI
#1
Posted 25 September 2012 - 03:27 PM
Its just so dysfunctional <__<. I mean really It must've seemed like a good idea. but When it comes down too it, Windows 8's Metro sucks.
I don't see anyone even using this on a desktop. Unless you have one of them all in one systems that has a touch screen or something.
The only way I could do anything to windows 8 so far was to scrap the Metro interface completely, with the Windows 7 explorer for 8.
which works a lot better then classic shell. or that god forbidding Start8 by StarDock.
So whats everyone's thoughts on Windows 8, and its new Interface Metro?
#2
Posted 25 September 2012 - 04:29 PM
I'm sticking with Windows 7 until support for it ends. Then I'm switching to Linux. I refuse to use Windows 8.
#3
Posted 25 September 2012 - 04:36 PM
Still though... I'm scared of Windows 8... really I am, I just wonder if its going to be hated as much as Windows ME and Vista
#4
Posted 25 September 2012 - 04:43 PM
#5
Posted 25 September 2012 - 04:58 PM
#6
Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:06 PM
[/discussion]
#7
Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:38 PM
I'll just ignore it. If you noticed, Microsoft has a pattern with Windows OS releases: Shit (95), Good (98), Shit (2000/ME), Good (XP), Shit (Vista), Good (7). So naturally 8 is the SHIT release, while 9 should be the Good release x3.
It seems you are right, It does seem that way doesn't?, lol. That's actually quite funny.
Even though I did like Windows Vista it ran pretty good except that it had bad Ram management.
Metro is terrible and you should all jump to Linux or stay with 7.
[/discussion]
I might make the jump to Linux at some point... But for the time being I'll wait till I can't stand Windows no more.
#8
Posted 25 September 2012 - 07:01 PM
Have lots of things installed? Enjoy our intuitive[citation needed] new interface!
(this is a screencap from a Windows 8 virtual machine running on a Mac; it can see all the Mac apps too)
#9
Posted 25 September 2012 - 08:40 PM
</thread>
#10
Posted 25 September 2012 - 08:56 PM
So basically, I'm agreeing with Russ here.
#11
Posted 25 September 2012 - 09:46 PM
The whole interface is really pointless to me, but I can live with it for now. What I really enjoy are my fast boot times. I think I can get tp the desktop from a cold start in about 15 seconds or so, but I'd have to time it.
#12
Posted 26 September 2012 - 02:16 AM
My main issue is that I'm using the Beta from their website, and of course it's still buggy. I hope to see general fixes for these silly errors, such as the Mail app not syncing without logging out of Windows.
#13
Posted 26 September 2012 - 01:19 PM
#14
Posted 26 September 2012 - 02:01 PM
I hope you guys know that MS dropped the name "Metro" due to an infringement.
#15
Posted 26 September 2012 - 08:35 PM
I hope you guys know that MS dropped the name "Metro" due to an infringement.
No, I didn't. However I do know that 8 sucks. What's the point of replacing the start menu with a stupid touch screen OS-esque menu? The start menu was much more straight forward. In 7 and XP, you could turn your PC off in about 2 clicks (1 in 7). Just press the windows key, and then click sleep or shutdown. In 8 you have to go through a bunch of freaking menus just to choose whether or not you put your computer to sleep, shut it down, or etc.... And to talk about things besides the removal of the start menu, task manager seems to be more simplified and "user friendly". I don't want to have a bunch of menus to go through, I want to see my f**king running applications and processes. Removing malware will be a problem as from what I have heard, do to certain problems with the OS, a virus would be able to make it unbootable, like what a virus could do to an Win95 machine. With that being said... removing a virus WON'T be a problem, as the only solution would be reinstalling windows. My god windows 8 is going to fail without a doubt. I think it has already been established that 7 is the new XP, and we will be using it for the next 10 years.
Edited by King Harkinian, 26 September 2012 - 08:36 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users