Twilight_Knight:
2005: Not bad for first tries, the second could be really exciting, except if it's part of a whole forest, then this foliage can be annoying all over.
2006/7: With higher detail, these could be wonderful. So, you had skill, just were inexperienced.
2008: And so here you are with DoR2.0 Improvement since 2006, but DoR and DoR2.0 screens hard to compare. Still, your evolvation was continous, and seems like it takes time for you to get used to a new tileset.
2005: Well, I used NewFirst and basically didn't know how good screens looked that time. I didn't play much quests so. Anyway, for example I use many minitrees on the screen border in the first screen(winter), that bugs me now.
2006/7: It were the first times using DoR and everytime it was a different area, I improved in the main time though, wished I could show some later screens, but I only have the older files.
2008: No comments on that.
@vravelo: I don't get what you mean either, if you want to critisize someones screens I would first advertise to use the right words. What does "I can give a full set of credits to the maker..."? I think all these things were made by LinkMystro? Ehhh....
Ohh, forgot to comment on LinkMystro's screens:
I think all screens are a little to cartoonish, but I remembered you making some great Tileset, but where is it left? I also think you change to fast from projects, you should stick on to a quest/set sometime, see what you can get out of peoples comments, don't drop your projects to fast, maybe they turn out to be great. For the now screens, the last one, you should do some improvements on the trees, the trunk looks to thick this way.
Edited by Twilight_Knight, 07 May 2008 - 03:05 AM.