What do you think the termination section of the license is for? This isn't someone trying to shut down a fork.
It absolutely isn't for what it's being used for here lol! And it cannot be invoked, either; the license is *irrevocable* as long as we don't breach the specific terms of the license, per section 2. As we have not breached any of the terms of this license, it cannot be revoked. War Lord here attempts to be declaring us moving the repo as a violation of the license.... but uh, nowhere in the license does it say "Don't move the repo", so, that does not appear to be a valid thing to base a breach of license claim on.
The types of things the license WOULD forbid include:
- Conveying a modified version of the source without notice that it is modified by someone aside from the original source (Given that we post all our builds very conspicuously, and the repo has all of our usernames on the commit messages, that seems like plenty of notice to me - plus `changelog.txt` in every download serving similar purpose)
- Attempting to convey the source under a different license, or failing to include the license with a conveyed version of the source (license.txt is in the repo, last modified when Saffith committed it initially 8 years ago)
- Conveying the object code (.exes) without conveying the source (either directly with the download, or in a known location) (the source is on the github repo, that covers this)
...which clearly we have not violated any of. War lord's stated reason of "It does not permit the licensee to remove, move, or otherwise modify a MASTER CODE BASE to a location controlled by another entity;" is nonsense. While the license does not explicitly state that someone MAY do so, it does not state that they MAY NOT do so either; and if something that is not mentioned either allowed or denied being done is enough to get the license revoked, then, well, breathing or drinking a glass of water would be enough to revoke your license as those are not explicitly allowed as part of the license.