Additional grammar rule
#61
Posted 29 August 2005 - 11:06 AM
Just goes to show what two years of computer class can do to you. It just goes faster when I use "regular" hand.
Hey, someone get Dustminion over here. He/she is the Grammar Witch.
#62
Posted 29 August 2005 - 10:34 PM
#63
Posted 30 August 2005 - 12:18 PM
#64
Posted 30 August 2005 - 04:46 PM
#65
Posted 30 August 2005 - 04:52 PM
So I say good thinking, Wild Bill!
#66
Posted 02 September 2005 - 09:52 PM
Can't we all just agree that shorthand is acceptable but mildly frowned upon by all?
This rule is good.
Edited by Zemious, 02 September 2005 - 09:52 PM.
#67
Posted 05 November 2006 - 05:42 PM
#68
Posted 05 November 2006 - 10:02 PM
Shorthand makes you look like an idiot, so honestly enough if you want to look like an idiot go ahead. Although I do like what they did on the Lemon Demon forum, using the world filters to make the people look even dumber than they already do... as in "u" translates into "URETHA"... lol translates into something to but I forgot it.
Edited by EatinCake, 05 November 2006 - 10:04 PM.
#69
Posted 05 November 2006 - 10:06 PM
Yeah, I just talked to Spaz about that too about gravedigging. However, this is a pinned topic so can actually still post in it. So he wasn't breaking any rules. However, EatinCake, you are being a Rent-a-Mod which is also against the rules. So please remember to keep the Mod work for the Mods. Thanks.
Edit: I see that you figured out what you did before I posted and changed your post.
Edited by Shoelace, 05 November 2006 - 10:08 PM.
#70
Posted 07 November 2006 - 09:46 AM
#71
Posted 07 November 2006 - 01:02 PM
Thanks for being a little lighter on the shorthand. Sometimes I would shorthand something by accident (for instance "u" for "you"). I don't do it on purpose. It's just that I sound words out in my head, and for "you" and "are", I would accidentally type them out as letters. I accidentally did it in the chatroom, and WildBillBot scolded me pretty hard. Hopefully, that was just some sort of automated somethingorrather and not an actual user.
#72
Posted 08 November 2006 - 02:11 AM
lol
Yeah I'm happy we have this rule. I could just imagine right now if we didn't have it.
#73
Posted 14 November 2006 - 05:41 AM
Nobody really broke the gravedigging rule this time around, but I would note that when a post is made in an old announcement, it bumps the thread into the "PureZC Forums latest news" heading on the forum index. This is rather confusing... perhaps the admins might want to consider another way of going about it.
#74
Posted 14 November 2006 - 01:19 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users