Kerry for president!
#16
Posted 01 October 2004 - 02:27 AM
#17
Posted 01 October 2004 - 02:40 AM
#18
Posted 10 October 2004 - 10:17 PM
#19
Posted 10 October 2004 - 11:01 PM
Knock yourself out Xpert! Actually I think you have dug yourself in pretty deep here with this draft nonsense. Here is a News Article so you can catch up on current events and what is / is not baloney.
While you are reading, take note of who voted for the draft: Two Demo Rats!
"Voting for the measure were Reps. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), who long has argued the United States needs more troops in Iraq, and Fortney "Pete" Stark (D-Calif.), a 32-year House veteran."
Have fun!
#20
Posted 11 October 2004 - 01:51 AM
I'm very hesitant to believe Kerry or Edwards ever voted for anything resembling draft, because if they had, then the Bush campaign would have barraged them with accusations about it, which they have not.
#21
Posted 11 October 2004 - 08:25 AM
I'm very hesitant to believe Kerry or Edwards ever voted for anything resembling draft, because if they had, then the Bush campaign would have barraged them with accusations about it, which they have not.
C'mon Radien! You have made some pretty darned good arguments for the wrong side. This is about as weak as an argument can get.
a) Yes WashingtonPost.com offers subscriptions and they print a very liberal paper. The link takes you to the story "House GOP Brings Up Draft in Order to Knock It Down" and I see no demand to login, only a place to "sign in" if you like. Readers can find this and other stories by googling for "draft bill" or some such. Here is Yahoo! story if it makes you feel better.
b) Nobody said the Johns voted for it. Article says two house Demo rats did, and even gave the names. You just did what you accused the GOP of doing.
Play again?
Edited by shadow, 11 October 2004 - 10:54 AM.
#22
Posted 11 October 2004 - 09:40 AM
Edited by davidballardjr, 11 October 2004 - 09:41 AM.
#23
Posted 11 October 2004 - 04:44 PM
For me, the site says "Register Now: It's Free and Required" and it doesn't show the article. I never doubted that the Washington Post is a good newspaper; I just don't have any money I'm free to spend right now. And whether or not it's "liberal" doesn't matter to me, either, since I don't try to see things in black and white.
It looks like I missed the quote you took from the article; I clicked on the link before I finished your post and forgot to read the last line. The reason I assumed that you were talking about Kerry/Edwards is because what you are talking about is much less relevant. It's not like I voted for either of those two you mentioned.
Also, what exactly do you say I'm doing that I accuse the GOP of? If you're trying to say I'm talking about a subject without researching it, then no, I'd accuse a lot of people of doing that. But lately, what I usually run into are people who simply repeat Bush attack ads, usually word for word.
DavidBallardjr:
So he doesn't have a plan... again, have you looked at his website and read about it? Kerry has written entire books on some of the things he wants to do. He does have a plan. But you can't disagree with it until you read it.
Edited by Radien, 11 October 2004 - 04:57 PM.
#24
Posted 11 October 2004 - 08:36 PM
*Check this out:http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38738
#25
Posted 12 October 2004 - 04:32 AM
Which is more scary: cooperating with the U.N., or telling them "screw you"? I think the latter. Especially since the most powerful countries in the U.N. are our allies... assuming they stay that way after this mess, that is.
Anyway, the idea of the U.N. ever controlling the U.S. is, at this point in time, extremely silly. The U.S. has always been powerful enough to back out at any time (usually quite rudely), and the U.N. is usually quite frustrated because they can't do anything about it. To be afraid that they could do something about it shows more weakness than strength.
Kerry is a gun hobbyist.
It's amazing how people cling to blanket statements sometimes...
*snicker* Gotta fit communist paranoia in there somewhere. After all, you can't truly insult somebody in America without calling them a "damn Commie!"
#26
Posted 13 October 2004 - 07:37 AM
The big issue everyone is talking about is the threat of terror. Kerry says that if he were in office, terrorism would not be the main focus of the US, it would be a nuisence. A nuisence? That just screams nuclear strike. Then Bush comes back with that should be the main focus for the US right now. Main focus? Oh, what about that other thing, y'know... the one that will cause the slow, eventual collapse of the United States. Y'know, that thing called... the ECONOMY! I want to hear one of the them shut up about the terrorism and stop with the mudslinging, and give a straight answer on what they're going to do about three things. The econmoy, gasoline prices, and finally, foreign relations. Not terrorism, foreign relations. How do they plan to handle other nations' problems. I don't want someone who's going to go Vietnam on us and get thousands of soldiers killed in someone else's war (and that's where Bush is heading in my opinon).
I'm kind of glad I never registered to vote this year, as I don't think I could justify voting for eather of these men.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users