Hey, thanks for doing that Radien...FWIW, you quoted me saying "not a chance" on drawing something--I was referring to drawing the mouth of the alligator opening and closing, that's not something I could do (or it's hard enough I don't want to try)...I actually said I could draw the fish just floating there, since as you say, that's not a hard one. But I'm happy to take these that you have kindly done and donated already.
Whoops. You're right. I obviously mixed up the two quotes.
Well, please enjoy the fish anyway. I submitted them to the database, BTW.
Oh, I wouldn't argue with this in general. I mean the new tiles you donated here will probably look a lot better for these reasons. But in some cases I'm quite happy to "get away with it". Somethings are "close enough for government work", and while I wouldn't discourage anyone from tending to details, using the stream fish in a pond or open water is definitely "close enough for government work this hobby."
Suit yourself. Personally, if I only had the original fish shadows, I'd be perfectly content to not have visible fish in the quest's lakes and ponds, etc. After all, most Zelda games don't have visible fish in regular bodies of water, anyway.
About image size: I checked again, and this time cremeen's shot shows up as the same size when I "view image." In other words, big in both views. I don't know why I had a discrepancy earlier, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't zoomed out.
Anyway, I agree with Sheik: a size limit might make sense. If more people used larger images, it'd make sense to continue allowing them, but as it stands, the discrepancy tends to throw things off.