Pokémon X and Y
#106
Posted 10 January 2013 - 06:19 AM
Somebody mentioned something about the X and Y in the titles being a reference to gene splicing and DNA. That got me thinking, you know how Black/White made you go through the game without access to the older generation Pokemon first? Would it be too game-breaking if a special gimmick they're wanting to do for this game would be that you're forced to use the new Pokemon for the main game, but they're all only a single type when you catch them, and you get to splice a secondary type onto them? There's bound to be some sort of overly-powerful combination you could come up with, so I suppose there would have to be a limit such as only being able to choose from two or three pre-selected types to add to the Pokemon.
You know what? I actually really like that idea. If Pokemon doesn't go anywhere with it, I've got RPG Maker, I'll use it myself. Just gotta figure out the best way to deal with it, whether it be heavy-duty eventing or a lot of scripting.
#107
Posted 10 January 2013 - 07:31 AM
I feel bad for kids nowadays. When I was a kid into Pokemans I only had 150 to learn about. Heck, I can probably still recite all 150 of their names and a somewhat accurate list of their abilities.
It's kinda sad to me that the Pokemon franchise seems to invest all it's time and creative force into the main games which haven't really significantly changed. Sure they've added things like Day/Night, team battles, so on and so forth, but the core structure is exactly the same. Unlike Final Fantasy which completely reinvented itself with a loose union of gameplay, Pokemon is completely ok with churning out the same game over and over again.
Then again I'm no longer the target market for this and likely won't ever give them money ever again.
Crystal was the best Pokemon game ever x3. The first games will always be the first games, but they had their flaws. LOTS of them actually, and so many fucking glitches, but they were still enjoyable. Crystal was the cream of the crop; it was super polished, all the graphics were nice and colorful, the Pokemon animated, the music was nice, it was part of the Johto set, so that's 16 badges total, we could battle Pokemon Trainer Red whom is still the highest level trainer ever, Lanturn was introduced in this region, the series was innovated the most during these games with Day/Night, Breeding, etc, to make the world feel more like a world, and the list just goes on. Crystal had very few flaws that I can name off the back of my hand: Kanto needed more events, because there wasn't that much going on over there, minus the Team Rocket subplot, all of the trainers and Gym Leaders in Kanto were way too weak, I mean Lv 30's and 40's when you plowed through the League in the 50's? But otherwise, it has the most content of all the GBC games. When Ruby/Sapphire came out, you'd THINK it'd have been like that and even more, but it was actually a major letdown in regards to content. They actually DROPPED the day/night system first of all, god knows why, and the only really new thing here was Abilities.
But the point I'm trying to make is, while there are far more than 151 or 251 (Johto) Pokemon, and it's hard to get them all now, no one said that had to be the goal anymore. I stopped caring about Pokedex completion years ago. It's just not feasible anymore, especially when there's so many Event only Pokemon. Some would say "Just go to the GTS (Global Trade Station), but they clearly haven't seen the ridiculous offers people put up there. You either have to get super lucky to find a Legit trade, or just wait for an event that never happens.
Of course, we all know, with each new game, the engine improves significantly. So that said, minus the (slightly flawed) graphics for Gen 6, we can definitely expect to see the mechanics of the familiar Pokemon system beefed up abit, and some convenient changes made. The real question is....is it actually worth getting a 3DS for one game? The answer is, hell no.
#108
Posted 10 January 2013 - 07:53 AM
No. Just no. If anything, make it into a powerful, viable non-demon pokemon like Darmitan (who is #555 in the pokedex).
What I really want to see this generation is a Normal/Ghost type because is
#109
Posted 10 January 2013 - 12:56 PM
But yeah, I'm also seeing a second Psychic/Dark/Fighting triangle being a plausible theory. What I'm curious to see though is if it would compound the advantage the starters have against each other or balance it?
#110
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:22 PM
It's kinda sad to me that the Pokemon franchise seems to invest all it's time and creative force into the main games which haven't really significantly changed. Sure they've added things like Day/Night, team battles, so on and so forth, but the core structure is exactly the same. Unlike Final Fantasy which completely reinvented itself with a loose union of gameplay, Pokemon is completely ok with churning out the same game over and over again.
Then again I'm no longer the target market for this and likely won't ever give them money ever again.
You sound like me, except that I love Gen II as well and even more than the original games. I certainly did write off the franchise for a while because each game released was just a rehash of the last game (or a downgrade, in R/S/E's case). I feel like G/S/C were the only real expansions on the franchise, with a ton of new content and the awesome ability to go back to Kanto and challenge those gyms again. From there though, it was just the same boring routine. Sure, they had a few minor additions and such, but stuff that probably only really catered to the competitive battlers rather than those who care more about the single-player (like me). Black/White was a major disappointment. Black 2/White 2 probably are as well. Maybe X/Y will be, but for some reason, this is a game I want to play. It's probably the full transition into 3D, and the Pokemon Stadium-like battles. I just think it could at least be a neat change-up and new experience to play, even if it does turn out to be Black/White rehashed.
That... could be a really neat mechanic, and would certainly turn the franchise on its head. It might be sufficient enough to create a whole new angle that would successfully shake up the formula. The problem is... I doubt that this will be the case. At least, I doubt that you'd be restricted to Gen VI Pokemon in the main game, since the trailer showed plenty of other gen Pokemon as well. Unless they're just placeholders for when they debut more Pokemon, but I doubt it. Or maybe that's just me being hopeful, because I want my 3D Pichu dammit.
...
As much as I'd love to see this though, I doubt it would end up the case. Maybe a few select Pokemon from both past and present generations might be able to be tweaked, but I don't think all of them would end up like that. Which is sad, because I would freakin' love that sort of change to the formula. But I'll still be fine so long as it's mixed up in other ways...
Or Yamask and its evolution.
#111
Posted 10 January 2013 - 11:18 PM
Still, the game will probably be just as good as the rest of the Pokemon games. I was really pleased with Pokemon Black (haven't played Black/White II), so I'm looking forward to it.
#112
Posted 10 January 2013 - 11:38 PM
#113
Posted 13 January 2013 - 03:14 PM
You are probably going to complain how remakes are boring and that it's far better to get new stuff. But, face it: you are not getting new stuff. You get the old game mechanics with a new face (and one with uninspired/bad designs and artworks). You will probably get annoying new features such as those beauty contests and whatever else crap they crammed into the games after generation 2, though.
#114
Posted 13 January 2013 - 03:28 PM
Honestly, ignoring nostalgia and memories from playing the original two series, Black/White are the best Pokemon games to me. A lot of the battles are more streamlined, there's a lot more depth into leveling up than there were in the original series, and it's just really, really polished now. Sure, some of the new Pokemon in it are dumb looking, and I'll give you that the game could be more different as far as gameplay goes, but oh well. When you stack all the games side-by-side, the originals just don't live up as much as you might think when you take off the rose-colored glasses.
Also, while you and I may not care about the beauty contests and stuff like that, there are people who do. Plus, those things are rarely forced on you, so I really see them including that stuff as a moot point.
#115
Posted 13 January 2013 - 04:49 PM
I still think it'd be neat if they polished Red and Blue without adding crappy gimmicky content and remade it in 3D. Ever since the first Pokémon Stadium I used to wish they'd release something like that for the N64 back in the day. It never happened obviously.
#116
Posted 13 January 2013 - 04:58 PM
Oh, and when it comes to remakes, I'm not gonna complain, since HeartGold and SoulSilver are remakes and they're the best games in the series, bar none. >_> <_<
#117
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:17 PM
You sound like me, except that I love Gen II as well and even more than the original games.
I'm actually all with you guys on the love of Gen II. Crystal was my favorite up until the GS remakes which were beautifully re-rendered. I was more just referring to the benefits of having all these little dudes introduced stagnantly.
LONG LIVE POCKET MONSTERS.
#118
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:22 PM
Oh, and when it comes to remakes, I'm not gonna complain, since HeartGold and SoulSilver are remakes and they're the best games in the series, bar none. >_> <_<
Seems we're all on the same page. Crystal dominated until it was re-envisioned, though I would have liked to see Kris with an outfit update instead of Lyra. This isn't to say Gen 6 will automatically be bad, but I doubt it's going to top G/S/C/HG/SS.
#119
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:25 PM
I will say that I haven't played HG/SS, though. This is just based off of original Gold and Silver.
#120
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:41 PM
As for the original G/S, I've played Crystal, and it's fun and all, but really not as good as HG/SS. I'd probably say still better than B/W (B/W did lots of things that irritated me), but not as good as Emerald.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


