Hurricane Katrina
#46
Posted 03 September 2005 - 04:48 PM
#47
Posted 03 September 2005 - 05:17 PM
In a different light this should, should but probably won't work, show people how stupid it is to build a city that is 1 to 20 feet below sea-level. What sort of logic does that have? Also there was plenty of time to escape, so those who were dumb enough to stay back get no sympathy from me.
Also, the death count is only at 1029 direct, 260 indirect. And before you start saying that this was a lot, 3000 died in the 9/11 tragedy and 174,542 during the Tsunami in the Indian Ocean. Clearly this "tragedy" is nothing. In the end it's not even a dent to the population of the world or America.
Let's face is, while Bush vacationed, nature raped New Orleans because our president was too lazy to help EVERYONE evacuate and the poor were stuck in their houses waiting for a death that was inescapable. But then again, that's how life is.
Don't waste tears on people you don't know.
My condolences to those members here who know people who died there.
Edited by Jaivaz, 05 September 2005 - 11:33 PM.
#48
Posted 03 September 2005 - 05:34 PM
But I wouldn't exactly call them idiots for living 20 feet below sea level.......just think all the other states could be too congested for those people to move to so New Orleans could have been their only resort. Remember, the north is more the industrial type citizens and the south is more the modern times kinda citizens. The southerners aren't frikkin millionaires so you can't expect them to live far enough inland.
#49
Posted 03 September 2005 - 05:45 PM
Also, the death count is only at 1029 direct, 260 indirect. And before you start saying that this was a lot, 3000 died in the 9/11 tragedy and 174,542 during the Tsunami in the Indian Ocean. Clearly this "tragedy" is nothing. In the end it's not even a dent to the population of the world or America.
Let's face is, while Bush vacationed, nature raped New Orleans because our president was too lazy to help EVERYONE evacuate and the poor were stuck in their houses waiting for a death that was inescapable. But then again, that's how life is.
Don't waste tears on people you don't know.
When it was built, it was actually slightly above sea level, and the city is actually pretty old. As more people settled, they used the resources beneath them (water) and so the whole city slowly sunk below it's original level. Also, the ocean is rising. How were the first settlers supposed to know all that?
And also, are you saying that all tragedies are related just to the total death count? This will have a major impact in our future, just as the tsunami and 9/11 will have.
You know, I feel like ranting about the last paragraphs you made, but I know you already warned me, so I'll lay off.
#50
Posted 03 September 2005 - 07:16 PM
As smart as you are, and as much as I agree with you on many things, I don't think you completely know what you are talking about on this issue. Nicklegends cleared up some points, so I won't discuss them in particular.
Some people couldn't escape because they were too poor to find a means to escape. It is very easy to say get up and leave when you have your own vehicle or can afford to take a bus out of there, of which the bus rides were probably booked like you can imagine. It is easy to criticize people when you are many miles away from the situation.
And just because 9/11 caused more deaths supposedly, this does not mean that Hurricane Katrina was "nothing." You probably meant nothing in comparison to 9/11 rather than nothing in general, but I can see how someone could easily take that the wrong way. Sure much worse things go on around the world all the time, but by no means does that make the people in the hurricane lucky or fortunate.
But yes, Bush and Co. were too slow in their efforts, and his sympathy, speeches, and assistance are too little too late. His photo ops don't befriend me either.
#51
Posted 03 September 2005 - 08:28 PM
Want to rant about that? Feel free to via PM, I couldn't care less either way.
*Few by comparison to the rest of America.
---
You are correct, I didn't know much of this situation before and while typing up my earlier post.. But I have done a bit more research and still have pretty much the same conclusion.
As for the poorer peoples' problem I already addressed it. They are the misfortunate people without money and ways of transportation, but now there are less people like that and those who truly deserve to survive found ways to survive. Don't like it? That's the way life is.
#52
Posted 03 September 2005 - 08:33 PM
In a different light this should, should but probably won't work, show people how stupid it is to build a city that is 1 to 20 feet below sea-level. What sort of logic does that have? Also there was plenty of time to escape, so those who were dumb enough to stay back get no sympathy from me.
Also, the death count is only at 1029 direct, 260 indirect. And before you start saying that this was a lot, 3000 died in the 9/11 tragedy and 174,542 during the Tsunami in the Indian Ocean. Clearly this "tragedy" is nothing. In the end it's not even a dent to the population of the world or America.
Let's face is, while Bush vacationed, nature raped New Orleans because our president was too lazy to help EVERYONE evacuate and the poor were stuck in their houses waiting for a death that was inescapable. But then again, that's how life is.
Don't waste tears on people you don't know.
My condolences to those members here who know people who died there.
...
Most of your posts dont bother me as much as they did when I first join these boards but man you were out of line there, like NateA80 said there are a lot of homeless people there that couldnt evacuate the town and sure there are some that stayed out of stupidity but it doesnt matter. And I shed a tear for every life lost in the tragety.....Im going to stop there because I know im gonna start flaming and and dont need another pm in my inbox from a moderater so...have a nice day i guess.
#53
Posted 03 September 2005 - 10:48 PM
Yeah... >_>
If it's out of line to post your opinions... then I guess we're not in America anymore
Really, he doesn't feel much pain for their lost.. because he's just not a very simpathetic person if something doesn't directly affect him :/. I might remind you...
#54
Posted 04 September 2005 - 12:35 AM
Want to rant about that? Feel free to via PM, I couldn't care less either way.
*Few by comparison to the rest of America.
---
You are correct, I didn't know much of this situation before and while typing up my earlier post.. But I have done a bit more research and still have pretty much the same conclusion.
As for the poorer peoples' problem I already addressed it. They are the misfortunate people without money and ways of transportation, but now there are less people like that and those who truly deserve to survive found ways to survive. Don't like it? That's the way life is.
May I just ask you then: am I an idiot too, like the helpless victims in New Orleans, for living in the Bay Area right next to the San Andreas Fault where there could someday be a catastrophic earthquake? Should I just leave now so I never have to encounter one? I expect a major earthquake to happen in my lifetime.
And also, you admitted that tragedies are also categorized by the cost of damage, not just the deaths. How much financial damage did losing the World Trade Towers cause? I won't lie about the figure because I don't know it, but I guarantee it is microscopic compared to the damage in erasing a major city from the map. Two buildings are gone, versus an entire city.
And to be tortured to death from starvation just because Bush was too slow to react... At least the victims in 9/11 died quickly.
#55
Posted 04 September 2005 - 02:41 AM
If you had to actually live through it yourself...you wouldn't be calling it "nothing".
The death toll of Katrina may not be nearly as much as the Tsunami, or even the World Trade Center attacks...but it is rising everyday as people die of starvation, disease, etc. As for the damage...well, nicklegends already pointed out that the damage caused on 9/11 was micorscopic compared to what Katrina did...which wiped out a major U.S city.
#56
Posted 04 September 2005 - 04:41 AM
And Hero_of_Hyrule.. of course I would think different about it, that's only common sense. One who is raised to believe that fire is painless and holy and is then burned at the age of 15 will quickly change his mind because he HAS EXPERIENCED more and has MORE KNOWLEDGE.
#57
Posted 04 September 2005 - 07:28 AM
And for the refugees complaining they have to eat sandwitches and sleep in a Army cot.....
But remember this, NEVER trust aluminum and concrete leevers to hold a lake out of a town.
I do think it sucks for people who didn't get there license's, birth certificates, and other forms of identification because they can't even prover who there are so they can't get a job.
#58
Posted 04 September 2005 - 10:51 AM
thats just stupid...its his country, americans dieing and and he has no simpathy, well I guess its his "oppinion" so I cant do anything but b**ch about it so I wont.
#59
Posted 04 September 2005 - 11:13 AM
I do, however, find it ironic that (In a reference to Jaivaz's bit about Bush vacationing.) ... (And I hate to get into politics, but ... ) that Bush had wanted the Israelis to abandon a corner of Israel, demolish the buildings there, make the Israelis leave that bit of Israel, ... all so he could gather more oil from the Arabs there. Then look what happens. Katrina comes along, makes a corner of America uninhabitable, destorys their buildings, and makes their oil derricks all unmannable. Isn't the irony just horrible?
Kinda makes you rethink certain religious choices, eh?
#60
Posted 04 September 2005 - 11:16 AM
No.
What's this about about people being warned? I didn't hear about someone warning people o_O.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

This topic is locked
