30 replies to this topic

[Adem]

I voted for Sephiroth. Even if he entered that in ScreenRebirth as well, It's still the best one.

[Zemious]

Sephiroth's looks best, since my walls are a bit straight, eh... Deviance' is good too, but it could use some more variation design.

I disagree.

I like Deviance' shot a lot. I'm not a fan of NES style graphics at all but this is damn good.
I don't like that style because it looks like a two year old drew them, although Deviance really put some heart in to this shot.

[Shane]

Lol, yeah, I'll try something about it.

I guessing you got them for M&B Tileset? and is that a part of NTAeL?

[Twilight Knight]

I guessing you got them for M&B Tileset? and is that a part of NTAeL?

A yes and a yes. But I recolored the money piles into Cset 2, so that's why they might look bad.

@ faragj: Thanks, and the quest isn't downloadable yet. I guess neither are the ones posted by Sephiroth and Deviance. Though here is the thread for my quest, if you want to know more about it: http://www.purezc.co...showtopic=37914

[Shane]

I voted Twilight_Knight he describe it and its not like the others

[Dawnlight]

It doesn't really look like money piles. It looks like a pile of leaves.

[Adem]

I thought it was rocks weird shaped stalagmites or something. Maybe make them a little brighter. That may help. I mean, it's the same color as the dirt, so...

Edited by Rem, 26 May 2009 - 06:26 PM.

[Shane]

It doesn't really look like money piles. It looks like a pile of leaves.

At first it look like a golden tree then when T_K said "RICH" I thought that wasn't trees it was gold

[Twilight Knight]

Yeah, the message already was clear... Geez.

[Plissken]

You shouldn't let your descriptions make sure we know what we're seeing, we should be able to tell what they are by looking. That's the whole point of graphics, to be a graphical representation of the object you're describing. If you have to have a string everywhere in a game saying "THAT IS MONEY ->" or something like that it defeats the purpose.

Anyways, voted for Seph, only one with appealing design and look.

[Twilight Knight]

You shouldn't let your descriptions make sure we know what we're seeing, we should be able to tell what they are by looking. That's the whole point of graphics, to be a graphical representation of the object you're describing. If you have to have a string everywhere in a game saying "THAT IS MONEY ->" or something like that it defeats the purpose.

You're a genius! I'm definitely gonna use that idea. A quest with complete random tiles and strings telling what they are meant to be!

[Plissken]

'Grats on missing the point. But seriously, if you use low quality graphics where people can't tell what they are don't think a description can make up for it. That's basic common sense and I can't believe I have to even type this out.

[Twilight Knight]

'Grats on missing the point. But seriously, if you use low quality graphics where people can't tell what they are don't think a description can make up for it. That's basic common sense and I can't believe I have to even type this out.

Well, first of all, I didn't know they were so unclear, so it's impossible to suddenly change my SotW shot, second of all, I said I would work on it, so your rants are very unnecessary. Third of all, I wish I could show an updated version, but CastChaos is having the file. So those are another 3 reasons to stop destroying my good mood.

Btw: Seems like this SotW is rather becoming: Twilight_Knights-Unclear-Money-Piles-Lets-Go-Rant-And-Pick-On-Him Screenshot of the Week. Which means I participate next week too.

Edited by Twilight_Knight, 28 May 2009 - 05:40 PM.

[Plissken]

Yeah, the message already was clear... Geez.

All I wanted was to make sure you didn't think adding a description made up for poor presentation.