Super Smash Bros. Brawl
#1681
Posted 21 January 2008 - 01:54 PM
As for Krystal, it would be great to see a staff-user in Brawl. But, Krystal's appearance in Star Fox Adventures was questionable. Maybe she'll either use her Assault suit or a new suit, entirely? (personal recommendation)
Yeah, I'm sure what I just said may get criticized, but that's where I assume that some of those who do have done the camera thing with Peach at least a few times. (I only know, because my sis kept teasing me like that whenever she plays as Peach. ._. )
#1682
Posted 21 January 2008 - 02:04 PM
#1683
Posted 21 January 2008 - 02:13 PM
EDIT: Well, I guess we know what the next three updates are gonna be. And I guess whoever forgot to cover up that shot is gonna be on bottomless pit cleanup duty for the next few years...
Edited by zmaster, 21 January 2008 - 05:07 PM.
#1684
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:43 AM
Bah quit yer bellyache'n!
1. Zelda is FAR from useless compared to Sheik. She is MUCH stronger, has a kick arse reflect move, and a projectile you can aim mid-flight. Sheik's only advantage over Zelda is speed, and while that's a great advantage it certainly doesn't render Zelda as "useless". If you're a Sheik-only guy, then you just suck at utilising the Zelda-Sheik combo.
2. In Smash Bros Samus fights with Link, despite being from totally different time periods. Does that make sense? Characters fight on the back of spaceships, in an environment devoid of oxygen. Does THAT make sense? Chewbacca is a wookie. Why would an eight foot wookie want to live with three foot Ewoks? IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE! So why ***** about TP Zelda transforming into OOT Link? It's a fact. Look it up. I heard it on the intercom... at work...
1. I'm not a Sheik-only guy... I use Zelda as well as Sheik when I play her, but I don't really use either character in a serious match. Marth, Link, Peach, and Young Link come before Zelda/Sheik in my line of viable character choices. My complaints about Zelda are A. her jumping ability is almost as bad as Link's; B. her up-A is 8-directional rather than arcing, she falls almost straight down after she comes out of it, and it does not damage; and C. her projectile attack has a tiny hitbox, leaves her vulnerable until she releases it, has zero knockback, is extremely slow, and -- worst of all -- can't hit or damage anything until the moment it is released.
As for the people who play Zelda/Sheik really well, though: I have never, ever seen a good Zelda/Sheik player who switches to Zelda at all. Before you criticize that statement and insist that I haven't seen any good Melee players, let me note that I've watched some extremely skilled fighters at two different anime conventions every year since the game was released. If that isn't enough for you, then ask ShadowTiger; I'm sure he knows a fair bit about Zelda/Sheik players.
2. The Dojo already addressed my story-based objection so it's perfectly all right for me to
Actually, I would have liked the two characters to be separate for gameplay reasons as well as story. For the most part, I think both Sheik and Zelda would be better developed if they each had an additional attack to replace down+B.
#1685
Posted 22 January 2008 - 07:09 AM
#1686
Posted 22 January 2008 - 07:46 AM
Edited by Bowser Blanchette, 22 January 2008 - 07:49 AM.
#1687
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:09 AM
#1688
Posted 22 January 2008 - 01:37 PM
#1689
Posted 22 January 2008 - 03:45 PM
#1690
Posted 22 January 2008 - 05:36 PM
#1691
Posted 22 January 2008 - 06:29 PM
Moonwhisper, thanks for backing me up on that line that referenced Sheik as a male. I knew there was one, just forgot what it was. I'm playing through OoT again so I'd've found that soon, anyways. >.>
I see your point, Radien, but also, SSBM says that Zelda has the ability to change her hair, eye, and skin color, so that'd help in that factor.
And you're right, Sheik should've been a seperate character, since TP Zelda and OoT Zelda are two different people. BUT, one of the options for costumes is the way Zelda used to look, so there you go... or something.
#1692
Posted 22 January 2008 - 06:49 PM
#1693
Posted 22 January 2008 - 07:21 PM
#1694
Posted 22 January 2008 - 07:26 PM
#1695
Posted 22 January 2008 - 07:27 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


