Jump to content

Photo

Pokémon X and Y


  • Please log in to reply
832 replies to this topic

#136 Koh

Koh

    Tamer Koh

  • Members
  • Real Name:Dominic
  • Location:Monsbaiya, Virginia

Posted 24 January 2013 - 09:57 AM

QUOTE(Migokalle @ Jan 24 2013, 09:09 AM)  

There's no way a console such as the Gameboy is ever going to be 'put back on the market'. If you really think so, that only shows how little you know about how this industry works.

What you may see is stuff like the Duo-SNES that's been around for a while, that lets you play both NES and SNES-games. There's a lot of consoles like these around, but they are not developed by the original manufacturers, nor are they official. Nor will anyone make any new games for them with the hopes of getting sales. That's not happening. Why? Because they're old consoles. We have moved on. You can emulate NES on a phone now, and even if minor details like midi files not sounding exactly the same due to fonts (which might I add could easily be changed), that's not nearly enough of an intensive for someone like Nintendo to go out and release an ancient console on a market that they're already struggling with keeping up with. Especially when it can all be done on other devices, which would be cheaper and would completely eliminate the cost of producing new batches of an old console.

There's also the fact that almost no one would buy them. How do I know that? Well, it's pretty simple: this industry is all about profit, and console cycles are being stretched out and milked for everything they've got - the fact that they're not re-releasing the Gameboy shows us that they've come to the decision that there's no profit to be gotten from doing that. Another example that shows us they've been thinking about this, is the fact that we have the Virtual Console, which focuses completely on delivering older games to new and old audiences alike. That's their re-released Gameboy, if you will. And it's a glorified emulator.

It's not about the console being old. It's about the reputation of the company AND the hype for a game. IF they have both, and release a game on the SNES for example, I can guarantee 100% people would find a way to get the game because it looks promising. People do all kinds of crazy things for a good game, which is the point I was making. If a ground-breaking game, even if it's NOT on the most recent, up to date console is made, people go ballistik and do anything they can to get their hands on it. So if Nintendo really wanted to make an SNES-esque game without getting the details skewed on a newer system, they'd have no problem putting it on an SNES, making sure it's a good enough game to warrant such a thing, and then releasing it. The buyers will find a way to get their hands on it. Why are we still talking about this in a Pokemon thread XD? Let's make a separate topic if you really want to continue this.

Edited by Koh, 24 January 2013 - 09:59 AM.


#137 Moon

Moon

    goopy

  • Members
  • Pronouns:She / Her
  • Location:Viridi Town

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:05 AM

The problem with that, is that the SNES is no longer sold in stores, so Nintendo would probably have to invest money to make more new ones, which is simply not a good idea since it's so outdated, and if they wanted to make a SNES-like game they could just release it on the Virtual Console instead of bringing back an old system. icon_shrug.gif

If anything, I can probably see die-hard Nintendo fans buying new games for the SNES, but the rest, not so much.


#138 Moonbread

Moonbread

    Playing With Psychos

  • Members
  • Pronouns:They / Them

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:09 AM

And that, that is a very small minority of people who would even do that. Very, very small. They're just a vocal minority, and that's all. Nintendo would waste so much money trying to compete in a market by saying "Hey we brought the SNES back, everyone loves these, right?" when our current consoles are perfectly capable of emulating SNES games.

Also hey how about all 3 of those starters evolving into Fire/Fighting types, isn't that exciting? That'll show my rival when I choose the water starter and evolve it before our first fight.

#139 HylianGlaceon

HylianGlaceon

    Magus

  • Members
  • Location:Whatever dimension is between Sinnoh and Hyrule...

Posted 12 February 2013 - 01:27 PM

Bumping this...

Has anyone checked Serebii.net today? Supposedly a new Eeveelution has been revealed.

Honestly if it is, I don't like it. Looks like a Victini and a Skitty got thrown together in a blender with a bit of Milotic on top.


http://www.serebii.net/index2.shtml

Edited by HylianGlaceon, 12 February 2013 - 01:45 PM.


#140 Eppy

Eppy

    Alisa~

  • Members
  • Location:Boguslovania

Posted 12 February 2013 - 01:49 PM

I think it looks cute. Still wonder what type it is...

#141 HylianGlaceon

HylianGlaceon

    Magus

  • Members
  • Location:Whatever dimension is between Sinnoh and Hyrule...

Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:19 PM

I'd bet strongly on the type being Normal, unless they introduce a new type. After the Lucario type fiasco, who knows though.

If it is really an Eeveelution, It's probably exclusive to female Eevees too would be my guess. The Mystery Dungeon games always pushed Eevee as a feminine Pokemon.

With that, I still don't care for it. It really doesn't look at all similar to Eevee still which makes me question if it really does evolve from it.. I don't recall CoroCoro being wrong before however..

#142 Moonbread

Moonbread

    Playing With Psychos

  • Members
  • Pronouns:They / Them

Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:26 PM

Pretty sure it's a flying type. Why would anyone want a normal evolution for Eevee? O_o

#143 Moon

Moon

    goopy

  • Members
  • Pronouns:She / Her
  • Location:Viridi Town

Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:27 PM

QUOTE(Scootaloo @ Feb 12 2013, 02:26 PM)  

Pretty sure it's a flying type. Why would anyone want a normal evolution for Eevee? O_o
In addition to being immune to ghost types, Normal types often have a very large variety of moves and coverage, which is never a bad thing.


#144 Moonbread

Moonbread

    Playing With Psychos

  • Members
  • Pronouns:They / Them

Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:33 PM

Well, yeah, but a normal evolution for Eevee seems rather boring, since it's already a normal type. I understand that, yeah, that would make it less useless if you wanted to stick with a normal Eevee, but... Eh, I'd rather see the other types filled out first. Either way, sticking to my gut on it being a flying type.

#145 Moosh

Moosh

    The Mush

  • Moderators

Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:36 PM

I bet it's Fire/Fighting.

#146 Russ

Russ

    Caelan, the Encouraging

  • Administrators
  • Location:Washington

Posted 12 February 2013 - 03:09 PM

... Well... It's kinda hideous. I can't say I'm impressed with it at all.

#147 Koh

Koh

    Tamer Koh

  • Members
  • Real Name:Dominic
  • Location:Monsbaiya, Virginia

Posted 12 February 2013 - 03:14 PM

What's with the newest Pokemon designs having the fur that looks like clothing? It's not just me, right?

Edited by Koh, 12 February 2013 - 03:14 PM.


#148 The Satellite

The Satellite

    May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.

  • Members
  • Real Name:Michael
  • Pronouns:He / Him

Posted 12 February 2013 - 03:56 PM

Well, I'm starting to get less and less excited for this generation. Good thing there're gonna be older gen Pokemon in the game...

#149 SpacemanDan

SpacemanDan

  • Members
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 12 February 2013 - 05:45 PM

I like the new Eeveelution. ): It'll be another Eevee I need to track down to complete my gen 6 Eevee army. icon_twisted.gif

#150 Jared

Jared

    Deified

  • Members
  • Real Name:Jared
  • Pronouns:He / Him
  • Location:Massachusetts

Posted 12 February 2013 - 06:01 PM

When I first saw it this morning, I thought it was really bad looking. But now, it's grown on me. I'm sure we'll see another Eeveelution soon!

I wonder what other old Pokemon got new evolutions, if any. I'm looking at you, pre-evolution Lapras that is needed!


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users