Read the title.
You could draw a lot of lines from simulated point to point. I'd take a stab at it if I knew how the depth of field code would work, and it would be a lot easier with arrays.
With primitives, isn't wireframe 3D rendering theoretically possib
Started by
Beefster
, Dec 21 2007 05:59 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Beefster
-
- Members
-
Human Being
- Real Name:Justin
- Location:Colorado
Posted 21 December 2007 - 05:59 PM
#2
Russ
-
- Administrators
-
Caelan, the Encouraging
- Location:Washington
Posted 21 December 2007 - 06:03 PM
I believe basic 3D graphics were acomplished before. I will try to find the link.
#3
Eddard McHorn Van-Schnuder
-
- Members
-
smash the bye button
- Real Name:Ronny Wiltersen
Posted 21 December 2007 - 08:08 PM
It was. Though, it looked worse than wolfenstein, it was an accomplishment worth to take note off.
#4
NoeL
-
- Members
-
Legend
- Real Name:Jerram
Posted 23 December 2007 - 05:37 AM
You could draw wireframe primitives, considering your math skills are good enough 
I tried making a spinning wireframe crystal once... didn't work too well.
I tried making a spinning wireframe crystal once... didn't work too well.
#5
Beefster
-
- Members
-
Human Being
- Real Name:Justin
- Location:Colorado
Posted 23 December 2007 - 02:44 PM
The only problem is I can't imagine how the depth rendering works. I could do an orthographic view very easily-- subtract the z-coordinate from the y-coordinate.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
