Edited by TheMasterSwordsman, 03 August 2007 - 10:27 PM.
What's your programming language?
#16
Posted 03 August 2007 - 10:27 PM
#17
Posted 03 August 2007 - 11:02 PM
Edit: Ugghhh! My idiot sister posted for me while I was on the toilet. I actually say that I was going to study the coding that brings ASCII together. Besides, I personally am more interested in hard-wiring, like how the machine knows the really basic actions, like how to work with the processing system.
Edited by fuzzyman, 03 August 2007 - 11:13 PM.
#18
Posted 04 August 2007 - 07:06 AM
#19
Posted 04 August 2007 - 08:55 AM
...
No one? Haha, LOL.
#20
Posted 04 August 2007 - 09:49 AM
Scary? How?
The fact you have to define a data type to almost every variable, why the **** I need to use "cout <<" couldn't it be something more meaning full like "print:", shesh. And specially its user unfriendliness. Among many other reasons...
Edited by Brandon1, 04 August 2007 - 09:49 AM.
#21
Posted 04 August 2007 - 10:03 AM
#22
Posted 04 August 2007 - 10:16 AM
The fact you have to define a data type to almost every variable, why the **** I need to use "cout <<" couldn't it be something more meaning full like "print:", shesh. And specially its user unfriendliness. Among many other reasons...
cout is just one method to print stuff. In fact, it's the most basic way. By using different libraries, you can use things like printf and other things. The reason you have to define a data type for every variable is because the computer has to set the amount of space for the data. You see, C++ is very powerful because the user specifies more than other languages. So yes, it might not be very "user friendly", but it makes up for that in being more efficient and powerful.
#23
Posted 04 August 2007 - 11:23 AM
#24
Posted 04 August 2007 - 02:21 PM
#25
Posted 04 August 2007 - 05:20 PM
It was made for Phantom Menace, who had no idea how big it was going to get. So he made it public.
#26
Posted 04 August 2007 - 05:44 PM
#27
Posted 05 August 2007 - 08:10 AM
I also know and use perl a bit, and I've dabbled in assembly programming before. There's user-unfriendliness for you.
I grew up, so to speak, on QBASIC and I probably could still do it if forced to.
I know a tiny bit of HTML and PHP too - emphasis on "tiny".
What's much more important to me is to grasp the concepts behind programming, then you can apply it to almost any language.
#29
Posted 06 August 2007 - 09:07 AM
C/C++ for me, and a fair working knowledge of allegro, wxWidgets, libcrypt and a bit of sdl too (those are all libraries in C/C++).
I also know and use perl a bit, and I've dabbled in assembly programming before. There's user-unfriendliness for you.
I grew up, so to speak, on QBASIC and I probably could still do it if forced to.
I know a tiny bit of HTML and PHP too - emphasis on "tiny".
What's much more important to me is to grasp the concepts behind programming, then you can apply it to almost any language.
Hey Koopa what is QBASIC?
#30
Posted 07 August 2007 - 04:54 AM
QBASIC is a version that can also compile progams into .exe files. With the advent of Win95, it was superseded by visual basic.
Both quickbasic and QBASIC have wiki entries if you want to know more.
Just so you get an idea: this is QBASIC cult.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users