Possible Sequel to Twilight Princess?
#1
Posted 12 May 2008 - 04:52 PM
The Legend of Zelda -> Zelda II: The Adventure of Link
Ocarina of Time -> Majora's Mask
WindWaker -> Phantom Hourglass
POSSIBLY:
Oracle of Ages/Seasons -> Link's Awakening
So do you think the next Zelda game is a sequel to Twilight Princess?
#2
Posted 12 May 2008 - 04:56 PM
Then again, TP doesn't really leave much of a cliffhanger.
#3
Posted 12 May 2008 - 05:23 PM
And yes, I agree that Link seemed a total moron. Maybe he ought to talk. But then again, he'd probably end up completely vile.
#4
Posted 12 May 2008 - 05:35 PM
Personally, I don't care if it's a sequel or not; I'm not picky.
#5
Posted 12 May 2008 - 05:40 PM
He would be great in some TP styled fight.
So possibly a sequel to MC.
And TM, isn't LA a sequel to PH?
Edited by gray0x, 12 May 2008 - 05:41 PM.
#6
Posted 12 May 2008 - 05:44 PM
#7
Posted 12 May 2008 - 06:10 PM
Oracle of Ages/Seasons -> Link's Awakening
Links awakening was confirmed as the sequel to Link to the past when it was released. The Oracle games can be considered sequels to themselves. I would enjoy a Twilight Princess sequel.
#8
Posted 12 May 2008 - 06:44 PM
#9
Posted 12 May 2008 - 06:53 PM
But yes, a trip back to termina would be great. In fact, just an acknowledgement of the OoT series would be nice. I don't think the prologue of WW quite did it.
#10
Posted 12 May 2008 - 08:52 PM
I dunno about a TP sequel. I don't know why, but I don't think a TP sequel would be that good. Honestly, I would love to see another Zelda game involving Termina and/or Majora's Mask.
I LOVE YOU <3
Srsly, needs moar sauce. By sauce, I mean Majora. Maybe chuck some meteors at Hyrule or something. The days could be longer. I don't care if they take half a decade working on the game, so long as they make the dungeons as challenging as they were in MM. ;_;
#11
Posted 13 May 2008 - 01:54 AM
1 - Link never talks
2 - No TP sequels
Seriously. They need to come up with a new game now. All we've been getting lately are sequels, continuations on the previous stories (There shouldn't be any doubt TP was the chronological sequel to OoT). Personally, I like it better when they were all separate games, you know. One big storyline is fine, but there's something about the mystery of having an entire series of games being related by places and people only, not the storyline
And to answer your question, no. I don't think a literal sequel is in the works, however if I remember correctly, I read something about how Shiggy is wanting to piece together the entire storyline of Zelda, and TP was the first step to that end. I don't think the next Zelda will be TP2, but I do think it will tie TP in with another game
#12
Posted 13 May 2008 - 06:03 AM
#13
Posted 13 May 2008 - 08:50 AM
And it's really time for Nintendo to make a non-sequel Zelda, a Zelda that is completely different from any other (like WW was completely different than the ones before). I guess this long hesitating of Nintendo means even they don't know what to come up with, while bringing something, pleasing customers and explain the timeline better. Just because this latter seems to be the goal of theirs, too.
#14
Posted 13 May 2008 - 04:52 PM
And TM, isn't LA a sequel to PH?
Nope. Link was returning on a boat all by his onesy, savvy? *shot*
Actually, probably not on a console, but there's no doubt in my mind that PH will warrant another sequel, but probably a smaller game.
#15
Posted 14 May 2008 - 08:51 AM
@ CastChaos, TP can't have a sequel later on because it can't have a sequel ever. It needs to be a stand alone game; something only there to tie OoT/MM to whatever comes next.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users